Subject of review · Party A · Party B · Context / date · Reviewed [date]
Headline metric
$0,000
Key figure
00%
Another
$0,000
Scope
000 units
Unit rate
$0.00 / unit
One-line status or headline finding. A sentence of supporting context — why this is the moment to act, or the single most important thing to know.
How to use this page
A plain-language explanation of what this review is and how to read it. Tell each audience where to look.
Primary reader: the red and orange items at the top are the ones that need action first; the green section near the bottom is what already looks fine.
Specialist / second reviewer: blue Legal note / expert boxes flag the items where their read matters most. Everything is sourced to the original text.
Use the filter buttons to show only one priority, or print the page (it is formatted to print cleanly).
One caveat up front: state the scope and any disclaimer here (e.g. "practical review, not legal advice").
Show
The Issues — highest priority first
01
Critical finding — short, specific title
Critical
One or two sentences on what this is and why it tops the list. Lead with the consequence, not the mechanism.
What to do
The single action to take. Keep it concrete and immediate.
02
High-priority finding title
HighSource tag
What it says
"Paste the exact passage from the source document here…"
Explain the gap or risk in plain language. What could go wrong, and how likely / costly is it?
Ask for
The specific change to request, phrased so it can be dropped straight into a reply.
03
Finding that needs an expert's read
High
Describe the issue for the general reader.
Ask for
The practical ask.
Legal note / expert note
A more technical framing for the specialist — references, regs, edge cases, or the call you want them to make.
04
Medium-priority finding title
Medium
Worth fixing or clarifying, but not a blocker. One short paragraph.
Ask for
The clarification or tweak to request.
05
Low-priority / cleanup item
Low
Minor — a typo, a wording fix, a nice-to-have. Bundle these in with the bigger asks.
Ask for
The small correction.
What's already fine
Fair / standard — no change needed
Point that's handled well
Another reasonable term
Something standard and acceptable
One more
And another
Keep the list balanced
Headline metric — is it fair?
Sanity check
$0.00 / per unit
Show the math and the benchmark. State plainly whether the number is reasonable, and steer the reader's attention to terms vs. cost (or whatever the real concern is).
Before proceeding — verify
Documents / facts to collect first
First thing to obtain or confirm
Second item
Third item
Fourth item
Fifth item
Ready-to-send
Copy-ready message
Who it's from/to and the tone. Pre-written so the reader can send it with one edit.
Subject: [Your subject line]
Hi [Name],
Opening line that sets a constructive tone.
1. First ask — the most important change, phrased plainly.
2. Second ask.
3. Third ask.
Closing line. Offer a call if easier.
Thanks,
[Your name]
Source Document — Full Text
Where this was transcribed from, and a note that it's reproduced in full.
Highlighted passages have a numbered comment in the margin (they stack below the text on narrow screens). Numbers match the Summary Review.
Page 1
Section heading
Plain reproduced text of the source. Keep paragraphs short for readability.
Reproduced clause text with a highlighted passage that the comment refers to2, then the rest of the clause continues normally.
Another clause, with a second highlighted passage3.
Clause text with a medium-priority highlight4.
Page 2
Signatures / closing section
Closing / signature text, with the most important passage highlighted in red1.
Footer / disclaimer line. State what this document is and isn't (e.g. "a practical review, not legal advice"), who it's for, and the date. Prepared [date]